In fact, Young initially attributed that letter with his decision to remove his content from Spotify.Īfter Young made the move, several other artists and podcasters either pulled their content from the platform or pledged to stop publishing podcasts until Spotify put a policy in place.

Earlier this year, 270 doctors signed a letter to the company asking for a clear policy and accountability around content spreading harmful lies about COVID and COVID vaccines. This wasn't the first time somebody petitioned Spotify to take down content with misinformation. Spotify paid $100 million to have the exclusive rights to publish the podcast. Young published an open letter implying he wanted the company to take responsibility for misinformation shared on the massively popular Joe Rogan Experience podcast.

If you don't know by now, Neil Young and his record label pulled his catalog from Spotify. The Impetus For The Latest Spotify Conversation Hopefully, if you're currently going back and forth about this subject, this article might provide some additional insight or inspire you to look at the conversation from a different lens. We wanted to go just a bit deeper into the situation, specifically from the lens of smaller artists.

Recently, RootNote co-founder Jeremy Burchard was interviewed by The Guardian regarding his thoughts on the matter. And it's causing a lot of small artists to take a long look at their relationship with the platform. While Spotify is no stranger to contentious debates about how it pays artists or whether people are trying to 'rig' the system, the latest debate around Spotify hits different. And while 'streaming content' in general felt like an inevitability since Netflix pivoted from mailing DVDs to hosting movies online, the fact that Spotify got to it first with music streaming means the company comes under extra scrutiny. Spotify completely redefined the music industry when it introduced its unlimited music streaming model over 10 years ago.

Is spotify for artists down